He recognizes the moral duty to deliberate, and slowly shatters the credibility of the prosecution’s witnesses, one by one.
The jury is transformed as opinions shift, factions emerge, and prejudices are revealed.
One can only imagine the pitch to a Hollywood executive: “Twelve angry, sweaty, impatient men stand in judgment of a teenage boy accused of killing his father.
It’s summer, and the men are holed up in a jury room without even a fan.
A day’s worth of deliberations is illuminated by a pacing that is deceptively quick and, improbably, completely riveting.
12 Angry Men Facts Essay
Nothing much seems to be happening—more sweat dripping, more heads swelling with doubt—and yet everything is happening.Without anyone’s necessarily realizing it at the time, 12 Angry Men was among the first films to signal a shift away from the influence and sensibility of the Hollywood studio system. Cobb, Jack Klugman, and Jack Warden—known, if at all, for their New York stage and television work.The movie was shot in New York and, with the exception of its star, Henry Fonda, was cast with actors, the eleven other jurors—an all-star roster of character actors, including E. This was typical of the so-called New York School of filmmaking—with its focus on social issues, urban settings, and moral decay—which came to define an era of social consciousness and realism in cinema, stretching from On the Waterfront (1954) to Midnight Cowboy (1969) and into the 1970s.He marshals the facts in support of reasonable doubt, pushing back against the fury of the mob.A mild-mannered architect, he proves himself to be a better lawyer than the court-appointed defense counsel.The ease of adaptation didn’t spell commercial success, however.12 Angry Men was no blockbuster, despite the fact that it featured Fonda.12 Angry Men has become a cultural touchstone, a time capsule of American justice before the civil rights era and the expansion of civil liberties in the 1960s.Its influence has been vast, and it established Lumet’s reputation as an artist at the forefront of social change.The film was made on a very modest budget of about 0,000.Arguably, without Fonda starring and producing, it might never have seen life beyond the small screen.