Emerson’s idea was successful and is the base of what America still stands on.Today, we are back to where we were 137 years ago, trying to motivate our country to take initiative and become American Scholars.Man is then convinced "that he and it (nature) proceed from one root; one is leaf and one is flower."(296) This thinking of man is the opposite from the truth of the relationship between nature and himself.
Emerson’s idea was successful and is the base of what America still stands on.Tags: Proper For A Research Paper OutlineHrm Models EssaysJackie Robinson Research PaperEssay Questions Great Gatsby American DreamCreative Way To Write Your NameAnalysis AssignmentOutline Of Business PlanSmoking Can Kill You Essay
Emerson is confronting the nation on its continuous grip on England and European ways. Herbert seemed to have a lot of anger directed right towards my generation and I, I believe he is actually going against what Friedman said by “assigning blame rather than assuming responsibility.” I’m not saying that my generation should escape the fault for this increasing issue but it’s just not possible for us to be the sole reason, we’ve got to dig deeper than blame.
In Friedman’s article he uses facts to reason his thoughts, he doesn’t just blame Lady Gaga or Snooki like Herbert did.
In nature, Emerson reasons, we find everything connected and in our observation of nature, we find a window into our own self-discovery.
“To know thyself,” he writes, “and study nature become at last one maxim.” Continuing on, he encourages us to use books but cautions us from abusing them.
Emerson uses tone and style to further convey his ideas to the public. I’d have to say that I do agree with Friedman’s argument much more than Herbert’s.
The tone that seems constant throughout Emerson’s entire address is a confrontational one. Both of these writers were ultimately hitting at the same line of reasoning but the way each approached it varied significantly.
"To the young mind, every thing is individual, stands by itself.
Emerson presents this idea as a negative effect on the scholar because they seem to continue to break things down trying to find simple answers to complex questions.
Though each writer approached the issue differently, each shared a common notion; the youth in America needs to change When I first read Herbert and Friedman’s articles I was instantly brought back to Emerson’s “American Scholar.” While these arguments were addressing entirely different issues, they all motivate the same proposal of change.
In 1837 Emerson was persuading a nation to separate from their comfortable ways and to become scholarly Americans that would enhance their country.