This is why it is not permissible to cross the borders of other nations without proper authorisation.
This argument is particularly relevant if one speaks about the Operation Sovereign Borders during which the Australian naval forces violated Indonesian waters (Mc Adam 2013). Nevertheless, precautionary measures are permissible if they are aimed at protecting refugees.
The point being made is that asylum seekers deserve as much as any Australian.
Australia is a free country, and we want the entire world to believe that, so why are we trying to relieve asylum seekers of the joy of …show more content…
One should keep in mind that some of these people can be rather skilled professionals; however, they have to struggle with many bureaucratic obstacles. At first, governmental official should make sure that children of asylum seeks can get access to the educational services as quickly as possible.
They should not be detained in Nauru or Papua New Guinea (Amnesty International, 2013, p. One should keep in mind that some of them can be separated from their parents.For example, it is not permissible to force them return to the countries in which they can be imprisoned, tortured, or even killed (Showler 2006, p. However, governmental officials have a right to investigate the background of people who intend to find shelter in Australia.This necessity becomes particularly relevant at the time, when the threats of terrorism have increased dramatically.Nevertheless, Australia has a right to control its borders, even with the help of such measures as Operation Sovereign Borders, provided that this policy does not infringe on the sovereignty of other states.In this case, the conception of national interest relies on the defensive neo-realism.In many cases, these people can suffer from famine, thirst, or insanitary conditions (Mc Adam 2013).This is one of the pitfalls that should be avoided.At first, the Australian government must ensure that people, who are at the risk of torture, persecution, or discrimination, can find shelter and appropriate assistance.Additionally, they should consider economic constraints that limit the resources of policy-makers.They save up their life savings to pay for an uncertain boat trip which could easily have them killed with the same percentage of living.It’s a 50/50 chance, yet they are so desperate, they will literally do anything to get out of their country, even if it’s illegal.